In this video course, you compared two popular tools for managing Python packages: uv and pip. You saw how they handle package installation, dependency management, and environment reproducibility, as well as their differences in speed, ecosystem support, package removal, and governance models.
Choosing the right package manager is crucial for efficient and reproducible Python environments. As the ecosystem evolves, understanding the strengths and trade-offs of uv and pip will help you build faster, cleaner, and more maintainable projects.
In this video course, you’ve:
- Compared the overlapping features and use cases of
uvandpip - Benchmarked the package installation speed between the two tools
- Achieved reproducible environments using lock files and dependency pinning
- Cleaned up environments by properly uninstalling transitive dependencies
- Evaluated maturity, licensing, and ecosystem support for
uvandpip
Resources mentioned in this lesson:

David Bonn on Jan. 20, 2026
Very good material, thank you.
I started using uv in November and my biggest observation is that once you switch (I switched from pyenv + pip) it is very hard to go back.
And uv isn’t faster just because it was written in Rust or does very clever caching. And one noticable benefit is that if you have a lot of projects you will also save a lot of disk space.
uv generally manages having different python versions better than pyenv.
uv also has specific considerations for containers that bare-bones pip does not.